que01 c7425f5ed4 feat: make crosswalk and stop-line offsets solvable ...

Step 1 of the control-marking task, and deliberately server-only: no handle is
drawn yet. This project already shipped a range handle for `profile.interval`,
which compileGeometry ignores, so the control dragged and changed nothing. The
consumer comes first now.

Two kinds join the taxonomy — `junction-crosswalk-inset` and
`junction-stop-line-offset`, both on the existing `junction-approach` anchor. The
solver writes them onto the approach entry, `applyDirectJunctionPlans` carries
them onto the compiled approach, and `compileControlMarkings` reads them in place
of the module constants it used for every junction. They move markings without
reshaping the junction, so unlike width and cutback they deliberately do not
trigger a boundary recompute.

`applyJunctionConstraint` becomes an explicit switch. Its trailing `else` had
meant every kind that was not approach-width fell through to the cutback
validator, so a new kind would have been silently validated and written as a
cutback. The same non-exhaustive shape in the test fixture's `valueFor` is fixed
the same way, and now throws for an unnamed kind rather than answering with a
corner radius.

design.md's taxonomy is updated with it — a test asserts the two cannot drift,
which is what caught the omission.

Measured on a 41-road workspace with 8 crossings: both constraints change their
marking geometry, neither drags the other, and out-of-range blocks instead of
clamping. That measurement is not in the suite: the synthetic junction resolves
`junction_inset_m` to 0 because its crossing never binds to a plan, and the
committed OSM fixture has no crossings at all. The tests assert the wiring the
handles will depend on — values reaching the approach entry, distinct branches,
blocking diagnostics — and the gap is recorded in the test itself.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>

2026-08-28 15:01:36 +08:00

9.9 KiB

Executable File

Raw Blame History

View Raw